12 Empire of Pain Book Club Questions

ByBooks That Slay Editors Last Updated:

The Sackler dynasty: a name synonymous with wealth, philanthropy, and cultural influence. Their lavish donations have graced the halls of prestigious institutions like Harvard and the Louvre, casting a gilded sheen over their legacy. Yet, beneath this facade of benevolence lurks a dark truth.

Patrick Radden Keefe’s Empire of Pain peels back the layers of this complex family, revealing a fortune built on a foundation of suffering.

The Sacklers, it turns out, are at the heart of the opioid crisis—a public health catastrophe that has devastated countless lives.

In this discussion guide, we’ll explore the gripping narrative of Empire of Pain. We’ll know how a family could amass such immense wealth while inflicting such immense pain, and consider the broader implications of corporate greed and the erosion of ethical boundaries.

Are you ready to uncover the dark side of the American Dream?

empire of pain book club questions for discussion

Empire of Pain Book Club Questions

  • The Empire of Pain explores the Sackler family’s trajectory from humble origins to becoming key figures in the pharmaceutical industry, largely driven by their entrepreneurial spirit and medical innovations. One of the key points of contention in the book is the ethical ambiguity of their business practices, especially in relation to the marketing and promotion of OxyContin.
    What’s your take on the way the book reconciles the Sacklers’ undeniable contributions to the field of medicine with the ethical dilemmas presented by their questionable business practices?

  • Patrick Radden Keefe paints a picture of Arthur Sackler as an energetic and driven individual with a keen interest in both business and medicine. Sackler leveraged these interests to amass his fortune through his medical advertising agency and medical newspapers.
    Discuss how Keefe critique Arthur Sackler’s view of advertising as a public service and his failure to disclose his conflicts of interest.

  • The Empire of Pain depicts the Sacklers as devoted patrons of the arts, contributing to various museums and institutions of higher learning. However, this image of philanthropy is contrasted with the controversy surrounding their pharmaceutical business.
    What’s your take on the way the book explores the impact of the Sackler family’s philanthropy on their reputation and the public’s perception of them, particularly in the context of the opioid crisis?

  • Richard Sackler played a crucial role in Purdue’s decision to focus on pain management in the 1980s, leading to the introduction of OxyContin in the market. However, despite increasing reports of OxyContin misuse and addiction, Richard insisted the drug was not habit forming.
    How does Empire of Pain discuss the role of Richard Sackler and Purdue’s close relationship with the FDA in the escalation of the opioid crisis?

  • Radden Keefe details Purdue’s aggressive marketing strategies, including targeting regions with high numbers of workplace injuries. This approach, along with the company’s denial of the drug’s addictive potential, contributed significantly to the opioid crisis. How does the book frame the consequences of these marketing strategies and Purdue’s reluctance to eventually accept the responsibility for the misuse of the drug?

  • The book discusses how Purdue avoided legal liability for overdoses and deaths linked to OxyContin until a 2008 lawsuit. However, even after this legal action, the Sacklers were able to escape severe punishment.
    Discuss how the book explores the influence of the Sackler family and Purdue Pharmaceuticals on the legal system, and what does this suggest about the power dynamics at play?

  • After the lawsuit, the Sacklers sought to protect their patent on OxyContin, leading to the creation of a tamperproof pill, which inadvertently created a new market for heroin. This development underscores the far-reaching and unintended consequences of the Sackler’s decisions.
    Discuss the aftermath of the introduction of this tamperproof pill and the broader implications of Purdue’s actions.

  • The Sackler family’s philanthropic endeavors continued until 2016, when their association with the opioid crisis began to tarnish their public image. This led to the removal of the Sackler name from many institutions, including Tufts University and the Guggenheim.
    How does Empire of Pain examine the efforts to hold the Sacklers accountable in the court of public opinion, and how did these efforts impact the family’s reputation?

  • This book illuminates the Sacklers’ defensive stance towards the opioid crisis, blaming the crisis on addicts rather than acknowledging their role in creating and promoting a highly addictive drug. This attitude appears to reflect their drive to protect their fortune and profits at all costs.
    What’s your take on the way Keefe navigates the Sackler family’s denial of culpability in the opioid crisis, and what does this reveal about their priorities and values?

  • The author points out the contradictions within the Sackler family, painting a picture of a family that combines great contributions to the field of medicine with unethical business practices. They were able to deliver new treatments for chronic pain, but their pursuit of profit undermined these accomplishments. Do you think there are similar businesses all around the world that involves themselves in such unethical practices under the garb of philanthropy? If yes, discuss. 

  • Arthur Sackler’s collaboration with the FDA during the 1960s to promote certain products is a notable element in the story. This partnership contributed significantly to the FDA’s decision-making processes.
    How does the book delve into the influence of Arthur Sackler and Purdue on regulatory bodies, and what implications does this have for the pharmaceutical industry and public health?

  • Empire of Pain presents the opioid crisis as a case study of what happens when profit takes precedence over ethics and morality, especially when the wealthy can avoid the consequences of their actions. The Sackler family serves as a cautionary tale of this reality. Discuss how the book presents and analyzes the intersection of wealth, power, and ethics in the pharmaceutical industry, and what conclusions does it draw about the social and cultural factors that comes to play after a major crisis in the wealthiest nation of the world. 

If you liked this set of questions, here are some other options you can explore.